NUMBER: ACAF 1.04
SECTION: Academic Affairs
SUBJECT: Student Evaluation of Courses
DATE: February 1, 1995
LATEST REVISION: April 24, 2002
Policy for: All Campuses
Procedure for: All Campuses
Authorized by: Jerome D. Odom
Issued by: Office of the Provost
________________________________________________________________
I. Policy
Each campus shall have a comprehensive system of written student
course evaluation for every course taught by the instructors on
that campus, regardless of academic rank or tenure status of the
instructor.
A. The only exception to this policy is to allow the exclusion
of courses for which there are fewer than five students enrolled,
at the discretion of the unit administrator.
II. Procedure
A. Each campus, or college or department within a campus, can
use its own standardized evaluation form, but such form must
include the questions mandated by the Provost and the S.C.
Commission on Higher Education. Starting on August 15, 1997,
all student evaluations given in the University must begin
with the following mandated questions which relate to the basic
responsibilities of every teaching faculty member in the
University of South Carolina System:
1) The instructor clearly stated the instructional
objectives of the course:
2) The instructor clearly stated the method by which your
final grade would be determined:
3) The instructor clearly explained any special requirements
of attendance which differ from the attendance policy
of the University:
4) The instructor graded and returned the student's written
work (e.g., examinations and papers) in a timely
manner:
5) The instructor met the class regularly and at the
scheduled times:
6) The instructor scheduled a reasonable number of office
hours per week:
7) Please indicate your satisfaction with the availability of
the instructor outside the classroom by choosing one
response from the scale below. (In selecting your rating,
consider the instructor's availability via established
office hours, appointments, and other opportunities for
face-to-face interaction as well as via telephone, e-mail,
fax and other means).
1) Very Dissatisfied
2) Dissatisfied
3) Satisfied
4) Very Satisfied
8) If web sites, Blackboard, or other Internet resources were
a part of this course, to what extent did they enhance or
detract from your learning experience in course?
(Greatly enhanced Somewhat enhanced Neither enhanced nor detracted
Detracted Greatly detracted)
If this was a distance education course, please answer the following questions:
9) How satisfied were you with the opportunities to interact
with other students in the class?
(Choose from a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = "Very Dissatisfied" and 5 = "Very Satisfied")
10) How satisfied were you with the opportunities to interact
with the professor in this course?
(Choose from a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = "Very Dissatisfied" and 5 = "Very Satisfied")
11) How satisfied were you with the promptness of the feedback
that you received in this course?
(Choose from a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = "Very Dissatisfied" and 5 = "Very Satisfied")
12) How satisfied were you with the technology support required
in this course.
(Choose from a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = "Very Dissatisfied" and 5 = "Very Satisfied")
13) How satisfied were you with the opportunities to access library
resources and library support services for this course.
(Choose from a scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = "Very Dissatisfied" and 5 = "Very Satisfied")
The format of the responses to these questions may be in keeping with the
unit-designed format of the rest of the unit's evaluation instrument,
e.g. 2-answer (yes/no), 5-answer (Strongly Agree/Agree/Average/Disagree/Strongly Disagree),
or whatever the local unit feels appropriate.
Units may choose to exclude questions 9-13 above only if the course
is not taught via distance education.
B. Results of each course evaluation will be shared with the
instructor, but only after the final grades for the evaluated
course have been submitted to the Registrar. The administrative
head of each unit shall also retain a copy of the results of each
course evaluation.
Each academic department will forward a mathematical summary of the
responses on Items 7 through 13 to the Office of Institutional
Planning and Assessment for purposes of meeting external reporting
requirements and for sharing with appropriate University committees.
III. Reason for Latest Revision
Policy change mandates that certain specific questions are to be
used on student course evaluations in response to the Recommendations
of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS)Visiting
Committee, April 2001.
Return to Section Index
Return to Subject Index
Send comments to
Mark P. Becker
This page copyright © 1996-02, The Board of Trustees of the University of South Carolina.
URL http://www.sc.edu/policies/acaf104.html