The learning environment to include diversity of students, instructional materials, classroom management, and communication patterns.
The change in number designation is done to reflect actual practice. This course has not been, and will not be moving forward, taken by graduate students.The 300-level course is appropriate given the timing of the course in students' program of study.
Your proposal is being returned for the following reason(s):
Maybe just note that the grading scale should put in percent marks. It's assumed that this is meant, but the assignments are all listed by points, so the grading scale presumably is the percentage of those points attained.
Also, I assume that there is no similar 305P going along with this course to correspond to the former corequisite of 505P? Was that integrated into this course? Dropped entirely? There may be an answer to this elsewhere, but I suspect that we need a satisfactory response to this before approving.
Please address the above and return this proposal, through all the channels, by November 21, 2016 at noon in order to be considered for approval by the Faculty Senate at the December meeting. Should your proposal not reach the committee by the stated deadline, the next Curricula and Courses review cycle will begin in January 2017. We are looking forward to your making this cycle.
KC Kirasic, Chair
Faculty Senate Committee on Curricula and Courses
Approved on behalf of Elaine Belesky.