Development of sustainability
modules for freshmen level Packaging Science
courses
Prepared by:
Timothy Weigel, Assistant Professor,
Department of Packaging Science
This summer was spent collecting
current literature on recycling, returnable packaging, life cycle analysis,
and source reduction. In addition I attended the WorldPac 2002 conference
in East Lansing, which included a session on Packaging and the Environment.
Initial development work on the course modules has begun and I expect at
least two of the modules to be used in the Packaging Science 102 course
that I am currently teaching. Additional modules should be completed
and introduced in the course in the spring of 2003.
Development
of Building Cost Guidelines Based on Environmental
Life-Cycle Analysis for University Facilities in South Carolina
Interim Report
Prepared by: Marty Davis, Professor,
School of Architecture
This investigation began
in earnest in the Fall of 2002, and was suspended in the Spring of 2003
when I was on sabbatical leave, It is to resume this summer.
This study is divided into
two portions, one dealing with an overview of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
in buildings, the other focusing on the SC State Procurement Process,
The inception of LCA is often credited to a study on beverage containers
in the late 1960's. There appear's to be considerable data on product
toxicity using LCA. When reviewing literature of LCA and buildings
the citations are less frequent. LCA is a method of evaluating
environmental impacts of a product, process or activity throughout its
full life cycle, namely, from extraction of raw materials, to processing,
transport, use and finally disposal As an internationally accepted
approach guided by international standards in the ISO 14000 series, it
is being used and tested by numerous organizations. Considerable emphasis
has been placed by the US EPA on developing and implementing decision-making
tools based on Life Cycle Assessment. The EPA methodology is divided into
three parts:Inventory Assessment, Impact Assessment and Improvement Assessment.
Significant work on developing
software has developed in Australia (LCAid), the United States (BEES),
UK (Boustead), Germany (Gabi) and Denmark (SIB LCA). Assessment tools of
interest have been developed in Canada (Athena), USA (DOE2), and the UK
(Envest). Whole Building Assessment tools directed to
architects have been established in Australia (Ecotect), US (Building Design
Advisor and Green Building Advisor, LEED), UK (BREEAM), It is important
to note that in the US numerous 'sustainable building guidelines' have
been created, included California Tier 1 and 2 checklists, Minnesota Sustainable
Design Guide, City of Austin Municipal Guidelines, Standford University's
Guidelines for Sustainable Building, etc.
The data on state procurement
is a bit vague. In South Carolina all new state sponsored building
over a set value must follow the Permanent Improvement Project Approval
and Implementation Process. Nowhere in this process is
the mention of any type of LCA. There are numerous environmentally based
design guidelines and recommendations, however, no official use of life
cycle assessment is integrated into the procurement process in each of
the 50 states. There seems to be an opportunity to develop some input
into the South Carolina model for life cycle assessment especially via
the State Engineer's Office where it prepares a Certification for Construction,
and in the Agency Selection Committee which determines the professional
services required for he project. |