Skip to Content

My Palmetto College


Tenure and Promotion

Electronic Submission of Tenure and Promotion Files

information regarding the electronic submission of T&P files, including support documents, local campus ballots, and training sessions, as well as access to the Palmetto College Campuses Tenure and Promotion Submission Point

Tenure and Promotion Process Timeline (PDF)
adopted by the Palmetto College Campuses Faculty Senate, 17 February 2012

Tenure and Promotion Forms
links to forms for building your T&P file

External Reviewer Selection Form
(due June 1 to the Office of the Palmetto College Chancellor)

Each candidate for tenure and promotion, working with his/her immediate supervisor, will compile a list of at least five potential reviewers for the candidate’s scholarship as presented in the tenure and promotion file. 


Tenure and Promotion Candidate Rosters

These documents were created as a supplement to the Palmetto College Campuses Committee roster to allow better tracking of which participants should have access to appropriate documents in our first cycle of electronic transmission of tenure and promotion files. Any questions or suggestions about this document should be directed to Jean Carrano.

2016–2017 Tenure and Promotion Candidate and Reviewer Roster

2015–2016 Tenure and Promotion Candidate and Reviewer Roster


Tenure and Promotion Workshop Resources

2017 Tenure and Promotion Workshop Registration

2015 Workshop: Overview of Tenure and Promotion Process, handout by Lisa Hammond (1/16/2015)


Sample Tenure and Promotion Files

This password-protected folder contains tenure and promotion generously shared by Palmetto College faculty who have been successful in the t&p process.  To request access to this folder, please email Jean Carrano.


Peer Institutions

Peer Institutions List

Palmetto College Proposed Peers and Aspirational Peers
These institutions are comparable to the USC regional campuses system, and tenure and promotion candidates may select external reviewers this list. However, candidates are not required to choose individuals from the institutions on this list, and should select appropriate reviewers for their scholarly fields in close consultation with their division chairs and mentors rather than depending solely on this list.