|
Introduction
Introducing Botanical Collection
Applied Botany: Some Cultivated Plants
Ravenel in the South
Caroliniana Library
Type Specimens in the Ravenel Collection
Some Rare Plants Some Noteworthy
Plants
A New Species of a Fresh-Water Alga
Weedy Plants from South Carolina
Specimens from Some of Ravenel's
Southern Colleagues
Specimens from Some of Ravenel's
Northern Colleagues
Plants Named after Ravenel
References
Home
|
click
on the images for a link to related text or larger illustrations
Ravenel’s South
Carolina
Rand McNally’s New
Business Atlas of South Carolina
Chicago: Rand
McNally, 1892. Courtesy of the Map Library.

Henry William Ravenel was born in St. John’s Parish, Berkeley
County, brought up there at Woodville, Pineville, and Pooshee, and
educated nearby in Pineville and at college in Columbia. Following
his marriage in 1835, he settled near his parents, building a main
home at Northampton, and a summer home at Pinopolis (area indicated
by red arrow). In 1853, he moved for health reasons to Aiken,
living first at Hampton Hill outside the city and then in Aiken
itself (area indicated by purple arrow).
The third (red) arrow on the overlay indicates Society Hill, the
South Carolina home of Ravenel’s friend and correspondent Moses
Curtis, who supplied him with specimens from that area of the
state.
Henry William Ravenel
From the
original
photograph in Ravenel’s album.
Courtesy of South
Caroliniana Library.
The Social Basis of
South Carolina Botany
John L[innaeus]. E.
W. Shecut, 1778-1831.
Flora carolinensis:
or, A historical, medical, and economical display of the vegetable
kingdom; according to the Linnean or sexual system of botany.
Charleston: Printed
for the author, by J. Hoff, 1806. Black roan. Phelps Memorial
Collection.
Ravenel bridged
the transition in South Carolina botany from the informed
gentlemen-amateurs to professional science. The subscription list
for this volume shows the range of prominent South Carolinians
interested in botany in the early nineteenth century. Nonetheless,
Shecut, a Charleston physician, lost $1800 on publishing seven
numbers of this
Flora.
Botany at South
Carolina College in the 1830's
[Edward W.
Johnston], Catalogue of the Library of the South Carolina
College.
Columbia, SC: the
Telescope, 1836.
During Ravenel’s
years as a student at South Carolina College (1829-1832), the
College library already had significant holdings of books about
botany. The library catalogue published in 1826 was arranged by
subject and indicates the library’s strength in this field.
Botanical
Illustration in South Carolina, I: The state flower
Unknown artist, c.
1765.
“The Humming Bird
of South-Carolina and Yellow Jesemin.”
Current name:
Gelsemium sempervirens (L.) J. Saint-Hilaire; “Yellow
Jessamine.”
From the collection
presented by Mrs. William Carroll Brown, Belton, S.C.
This original
sketch comes from the earliest surviving sizeable collection of
natural history watercolors done in the United States. This is a
mid‑18th century album of 32 paintings from South Carolina and east
Florida, depicting both plants and birds. The album was acquired by
Mr. and Mrs. William Carroll Brown in 1952, and donated to Thomas
Cooper Library by Mrs. Brown in 1991. At various times the sketches
have been attributed to Mark Catesby (1683‑1749), William Bartram of
Philadelphia (1739‑1823), John Abbot (1749‑1840), or (most recently)
to the South Carolinian amateur artist John Laurens (1754‑1782), son
of Henry Laurens, who was in east Florida in the relevant years.
The state flower of
South Carolina, as collected by Ravenel
Gelsemium
sempervirens Ait.
Aiken S.C.
Apr.
86
HWR
Current name:
Gelsemium sempervirens (L.) J. Saint-Hilaire; “Yellow
Jessamine.”
No matter their
source, herbarium specimens of vascular plants are always made with
the same, simple demands: living plants must be pressed with
sufficient pressure to flatten them, and they must be dried quickly
enough to avoid the effects of mold. Modern plant collecting
techniques differ very little from those used by Ravenel and his
contemporaries.
Gelsemium
sempervirens,
which was named officially as our state
flower in 1924, is found in every county of South Carolina. This
specimen was collected by Ravenel in Aiken in April,
1886. The specimen itself has been remounted: all that remains of
the original sheet is the label, which has been taped onto the
existing sheet. In remounting, the plant parts have been taped
down. The date of repair of this specimen is difficult to
ascertain. Although it is likely that a number of specimens were
repaired and/or remounted by Ravenel himself, other specimens were
clearly repaired and/or annotated while the collection was housed
at Converse College. Many of the annotations on specimens were
supplied by personnel at the Smithsonian Institution, indicating
that much of the collection had been sent on loan from Converse to
the Smithsonian, now the home of the United States National
Herbarium.
A modern specimen of
the same flower
Gelsemium
sempervirens (L.) Aiton
Climbing vine¼Woodruff
between Spartanburg and
Greenville.
Jacquelin A. Clark
#56 Apr 8, 01
This contemporary specimen of the same plant is from
Spartanburg County, collected recently. Modern herbarium specimens,
and those at the A. C. Moore Herbarium, are mounted on acid-free,
archival paper. Generally, a printed label is attached (glued) to
sheets. (The star indicates that information from this specimen has
been entered into the Herbarium's database.) The plant materials on
both of these sheets are hardly distinguishable as far as quality of
preparation. The recent specimen continues to feature the yellow
color of the flower’s corolla; however, the colors of all a plant’s
parts will eventually fade. Transient features such as flower color,
flower aroma, pollinators, plant stature, etc. are properly recorded
on the label as observational data impossible to reproduce after the
time of collection.
Properly prepared
specimens feature all the parts of the plant (as is practical). Dried
specimens of plants, in general, retain essentially all the
morphological features necessary for systematic study, and thus very
old specimens remain valuable. Beyond outright measurements of the
plant’s parts, many aspects of morphological study are available,
including, among other techniques, investigations of stomatal patterns
and density, epidermal features, trichome (hair) characteristics, and
pollen features. Herbarium specimens, depending on their condition
and the taxon involved, may offer substantial sources of study
involving anatomy, biochemistry, and even molecular characteristics,
including DNA sequencing.
|