click on the images
for a link to related text or larger illustrations
A type
specimen of "Canby's mountain-lover"
Pachystima myrsinites, Pursh var.?
Coll. WM. M. CANBY
Giles County, VIRGINIA, May, 1869
Handwritten by Canby below this: "P. Canbyi, M. A. Curtis,
sp.nov."Current name: Pachystima canbyi A. Gray;
"Canby's mountain-lover."
A "type" specimen
is one upon which the original description of a plant is based.
In Ravenel's time, when a botanist published the name and
description of a new species, it was not necessary to explicitly
designate a specimen as the type, as it is now, a rule enacted in
1958.
This is a mixed
collection. (Note that the correct authority is Gray, not
Curtis.) The exposed plant at top was collected by William Canby
of Wilmington, Delaware (1831-1904), who presumed that it was a
variety of Pachystima myrsinites Rafinesque, a western
species. Two envelopes contain plant material as well: the upper
is probably from the same collection as the Giles County plant,
and is so labeled. The lower envelope is labeled "Pachystima
myrsinites Raf....N.
Mexico. coll. Fendler." August Fendler (1809-1883), a native
Prussian, botanized extensively in the 1840's under the direction
of George Engelmann and Asa Gray; his collections are among the
first from New Mexico. Ravenel included both taxa on the same
sheet, and inscribed this sheet at lower right corner, "P.
Canbyi Gray & P. myrsinites Raf." The upper specimen
almost certainly represents type material of P. canbyi; the
holotype is at Harvard's Gray Herbarium. In his description of the
new species, Gray indicates that it was Curtis, while still alive,
proposed that the name of the new species honor its discoverer.
Canby visited Ravenel in Aiken in 1869, and the two communicated
extensively.
A
specimen of Baptisia from the sandhills of Aiken County
Baptisia stipulacea Rav.
June
Aiken, S.C.
HWR
Current name: Baptisia microphylla Nuttall; “Small-leaved
wild indigo.”
This specimen is
probably a type. Ravenel described this species in 1856, later
(1876) remarking that it is "sparingly disseminated in the poor
sand-hill region in the vicinity of Aiken." J. K. Small, in his
1903 Flora of the Southeastern United States, maintained
recognition of this plant as a good species (as B. microphylla),
although more current taxonomic judgment holds it as a hybrid
between B. perfoliata ("rabbit-bells") and B. tinctoria
("wild indigo"), both of which are fairly common in modern Aiken
County.