Dean
Speaks... by Charles Bierbauer
Tell
it to the judge
I’ve never talked
with Scooter Libby. I haven’t seen Karl Rove since he visited
USC a couple of years ago. I’ve known Dick Cheney a long
time, but we’ve not discussed Valerie Plame, yellowcake
or Saddam Hussein. Those are my disclaimers.
Have I used anonymous
sources? Sure. In Washington, it’s hard to avoid
the background briefing—attributed to a “senior White
House official”—or the calculated leak. Occasionally,
you’ll hear from a whistleblower wary, even terrified,
of exposing his identity. If the information disclosed fits the
story, is credible and verifiable, you will probably use it.
Still, you always prefer on the record information to which you
can attach a name.
The issue that is causing
so much journalistic turmoil is not so much the use of anonymous
sources, but the journalist’s responsibility to protect
those sources. It’s also about the preservation of journalistic
integrity.
Here’s what we
need to tell our journalism students and remind our grads.
The First Amendment
to the Constitution is not a grant of immunity. It says Congress
shall make no law “abridging the freedom…of the
press.” But it’s not an impenetrable shield. The New
York Times’ Judith Miller was jailed for contempt
of court, a law intended to keep all of us respectful. Whether
Miller needed to go to jail or should have is fuel for lengthier
discussion than this.
Anonymous sources should
be the rarest kind, a condition rarely asked and even more rarely
granted. Absent personal or national security concerns, there’s
seldom compelling reason for it.
Manipulation has become
the norm of politics. Whether it was Scooter, Karl, the Veep
or yet another White House whisperer, the Plame game was cloaked—and
not very clandestinely—in political motives. The journalist,
eager for the nugget no one else has, must still question the
reason for the leak. Skepticism is one of a journalist’s
healthiest attributes.
Moreover, when a journalist
goes to court and becomes part of the story, the story changes.
Journalists are trained to be observers, occasionally participant
observers—I’m thinking of the embedded reporters
in Iraq. We’re headline writers, not headline makers. At
least, that’s the way I learned it.
Journalists have a place
in court and, from my experience, should have a bigger place.
The third and often decisive branch of government is too
seldom covered. Is it because too few journalists are trained
in the law? Is it too complicated for the tight news hole in
many papers and most tv newscasts? Are the media unwelcome?
Importantly, it is
not necessarily the latter. At a gathering of federal judges
and journalists at the First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt in
mid-November, judges expressed a willingness to work with
the media.
“I wish more
media would call me more often,” said Judge Andre Davis
of the District of Maryland. “We, as judges, are teachers.” Other
judges indicated they are not unwilling to talk with reporters,
even explain cases. But they are more inclined to do that when
they have established a working relationship with the reporter.
Judge Gerald Tjoflat
of the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
in Florida noted that he tailors some court opinions with the
media in mind, especially in cases with high public profiles.
Judge Tjoflat feels that if he writes for the media, reporters
should not have to ask, “What
does this mean?”
“The coverage
we get is pretty darn good,” said Judge Brock Hornby of
the District of Maine. “If we have a complaint, it’s
the coverage we don’t get.”
That argues strongly
for editors and news directors assigning experienced reporters
to cover courts and giving reporters the latitude to spend what
time is needed to get to know the issues, the cases and the judges.
Arriving at that kind
of a symbiotic working relationship with the courts might even
keep a journalist out of jail.
Dean
Speaks is written by Charles
Bierbauer, dean of USC's College of Mass Communications
and Information Studies and a former CNN and ABC News
correspondent. The
column addresses issues faced daily by editors, news
directors, public relations experts, and media managers
about our professions.
We
welcome feedback on these columns.
Read
Other Columns>> |