Office of the Provost

On This Page

Primary Alignments

Primary Alignment competencies have strong, direct alignment across multiple courses.

Expand All

• Leadership

  Leadership is the explicit purpose of this certificate. Activities should move students beyond passive exposure to leadership concepts toward applying, practicing, and reflecting on leadership in real organizational situations. The goal is not just knowing what good leadership looks like — it is being able to demonstrate it.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Leadership Case Analysis Students analyze a documented organizational leadership situation: a decision made under pressure, a failed change initiative, a successful turnaround, or an ethical crisis. They evaluate the leadership approach taken, identify what frameworks apply, and recommend an alternative course of action with justification.	What Would You Have Done? Present a real organizational case (a nonprofit leadership failure, a corporate turnaround, a government policy decision) with enough detail to evaluate the leadership involved. Students write a 1–2-page analysis: what leadership frameworks apply, what the leader did well, where they fell short, and what a student would do differently given what they have learned. Debrief focuses on how different frameworks (situational leadership, servant leadership, transformational leadership) produce different recommendations from the same facts.	POLI 215, MGMT 371, POLI 370, HTMT 490
  Leadership Identity Reflection  Students develop and refine a personal leadership philosophy across the course of the certificate. Structured prompts at multiple points ask them to identify their values, examine their assumptions, and connect their coursework to how they want to lead.	My Leadership Philosophy Three times per semester, students respond to a structured prompt: (1) What does effective leadership look like in your field? (2) Describe a moment when you led or influenced a group outcome. What did you do well and what would you change? (3) Which leadership concept from this course most challenges or confirms how you think about leadership and why? Over the semester, students compile these into a 1-page personal leadership philosophy they can use in interviews, LinkedIn profiles, and career advising appointments.	POLI 215, PEDU 302, MGMT 371, RETL 351
  Organizational Power Mapping Students select a real or hypothetical organization and map how authority, influence, and decision-making actually work within it, distinguishing formal hierarchy from informal power. They then analyze how a leader at a specific level would navigate that structure to drive change.	How Does Change Actually Happen Here? Students choose an organization type relevant to their career goals (a government agency, a media company, a hospital, a retail chain, a nonprofit) and produce a 1-page power map: who has formal authority, who has informal influence, where decisions actually get made, and where resistance to change is likely to come from. They then write a 1-paragraph brief: if you were a mid-level manager trying to implement a significant change in this organization, what would your strategy be? Connects leadership theory directly to organizational reality.	POLI 370, MGMT 371, SOCY 311, PSYC 350, POLI 215

   

• Communication

  This certificate has more dedicated communication coursework than any other in the interdisciplinary certificate series. Activities should treat writing and speaking not as generic skills but as strategic professional tools: every communication choice is an argument for how a student wants to be perceived.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Professional Document Workshop Students draft, exchange, and revise professional documents: proposals, memos, briefings, technical reports, business correspondence. Emphasis on audience awareness, clarity, and professional register. Peer review is structured around employer-facing criteria.	Write to Be Acted On Students are given a professional scenario and must produce a specific document type: a project proposal, an executive summary, a policy brief, a client memo, or a problem-solution report. The document is evaluated against a rubric that mirrors what a professional reviewer would look for: Is the ask clear? Is the reasoning sound? Is the format appropriate? Does the writing inspire confidence? Peer reviewers answer: after reading this, would you act on it? That question reorients students from 'did I cover the content' to 'did I communicate effectively.'	ENGL 462, ENGL 463, ENGL 468, ITEC 242, JOUR 291
  Persuasive Speaking Practice Students prepare and deliver short persuasive presentations on professional topics, with structured feedback on argument construction, audience adaptation, and delivery. Emphasis on speaking to persuade, not just to inform.	Make the Case Students are given a professional scenario requiring a persuasive recommendation: a budget request, a policy proposal, a project pitch, a hiring recommendation. They deliver a 3-5 minute presentation to a simulated professional audience (classmates in role) and must field at least one challenging question. Structured feedback covers: Was the argument clear? Was it adapted to this audience? Was the speaker credible? Did the close ask for something specific? Post-delivery self-assessment asks students to identify what they would change and why.	SPCH 140, SPCH 230, SPCH 260, SPCH 380, ENGL 387/SPCH 387
  Audience Adaptation Exercise Students take the same core message and adapt it for three different audiences: a senior executive, a peer team, and an external stakeholder. The exercise surfaces how communication strategy shifts with audience and builds deliberate flexibility.	Same Message, Three Audiences Students are given a workplace update or proposal and must produce three versions: a 1-paragraph executive summary for a VP, a 1-page briefing for their team, and a 2-paragraph external communication for a client or partner. Each version is evaluated on whether it is appropriately calibrated: Does the executive version lead with the bottom line? Does the team version include enough context to act? Does the external version build confidence without overpromising? This mirrors the communication switching that professionals do constantly and rarely practice explicitly.	ENGL 463, SPCH 230, SPCH 331, JOUR 480, ITEC 242

• Teamwork

  Teamwork in a leadership certificate has a specific shape: students are not just learning to be good team members — they are learning to understand, facilitate, and improve how teams work. Activities should build both participation skills and diagnostic awareness of group dynamics.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Group Dynamics Debrief  After any collaborative class activity or project, students complete a structured team debrief: what worked, what did not, what role did each person play, and what would improve the team's effectiveness. Builds the metacognitive habit of observing and improving team performance.	What Just Happened in There? Immediately after a group activity, each student independently completes a 10-minute written debrief: What was your role in the group? What did the group do well? Where did communication break down? What would you do differently as the designated leader? What did you observe about how decisions were made? Debrief responses are not graded for correctness but for depth and specificity. Class discussion surfaces patterns across groups. This exercise is reusable after every collaborative activity and builds the observation skills that distinguish effective team leaders.	SPCH 330, SPCH 331, MGMT 371, PSYC 350, SOCY 101
  Conflict Scenario Simulation Students are placed in a structured scenario involving team conflict: a missed deadline, a disagreement about approach, a team member not contributing, or competing stakeholder demands. They must navigate the conflict and debrief their approach.	Somebody Has to Say Something Students are given a team conflict scenario in writing and must respond in two ways: (1) Write what you would say to the relevant person or group to address the conflict directly. (2) Explain the approach you chose and why, citing any course frameworks. Pairs or small groups then role-play the scenario with one student as the person addressing the conflict and one as the recipient. Debrief asks: what made this hard, what made it easier, and what would you do differently? Conflict navigation is one of the skills employers most consistently say new graduates lack.	SPCH 330, SPCH 331, PSYC 350, MGMT 371, SOCY 311
  Project Coordination Simulation Students work in assigned teams to plan and coordinate a simulated project from scope definition through task assignment and progress check-in. Emphasis on structured coordination practices, not just task completion.	Run the Project Teams of four are given a project scenario with a defined deliverable, a timeline, and a set of constraints (limited budget, a key dependency, one team member working remotely). They must produce: a scope statement, a task assignment matrix, a risk log, and a 1-page status update briefing. Each team member submits an individual reflection on their coordination experience: what they managed well, where the process broke down, and what they would do differently as project lead. Mirrors the core activities of MGSC 498 in a cross-course context.	MGSC 498, MGMT 371, SPCH 330, ISCI 402

• Professionalism

  Professionalism in a leadership and management certificate is about accountability in organizational contexts: following through, operating within frameworks, exercising ethical judgment, and managing oneself and others with integrity. Activities should place students in situations where professional standards matter and require explicit reasoning.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Project Accountability Simulation Students manage a simulated project through a setback or failure scenario and must respond professionally: communicating the situation to stakeholders, identifying accountability, and developing a recovery plan. Builds the judgment that distinguishes a professional response from an unprofessional one.	The Project Is Off Track Students are told: 'You are managing a project that is two weeks behind schedule due to a combination of scope creep and a team member's underperformance. Your sponsor is expecting the original deadline. What do you do?' Students write a stakeholder update memo, a recovery plan, and a 1-paragraph reflection on how they would address the team member situation. Debrief covers the professional standards around transparency, accountability, and difficult conversations that project managers navigate regularly.	MGSC 498, MGMT 371, ISCI 402, JOUR 451
  Ethical Leadership Scenario Students are placed in a leadership role and given a scenario involving competing obligations: organizational loyalty, personal integrity, legal responsibility, and stakeholder impact. They must decide what to do and defend the reasoning.	The Right Thing and the Easy Thing Present a scenario: 'You are a department manager. You discover that a company practice you are responsible for implementing may be legal but causes measurable harm to a specific group of employees. Your supervisor has told you not to escalate. What do you do?' Students write a 1-page response explaining their decision, the competing obligations at stake, and the professional framework they used to reason through it. Debrief asks: where does personal ethics end and organizational accountability begin? Connects directly to EDLP 317 and POLI 370 content.	EDLP 317, POLI 370, MGMT 371, ISCI 410, PSYC 350

Supporting Alignments

Supporting Alignment competencies have meaningful, specific alignment. Faculty may find activities in supporting competency sections useful for reinforcing career readiness in targeted ways without overloading the course.

Expand All

• Critical Thinking

  Critical thinking in a leadership context is about the quality of reasoning behind decisions: constructing defensible arguments, evaluating options systematically, and diagnosing complex organizational situations with rigor. Activities should make the reasoning process visible and subject to evaluation.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Argument Construction and Critique Students construct a written argument for a leadership or policy position, then exchange with a peer who must identify the strongest and weakest elements of the argument and offer a counterargument. Builds the habit of reasoning under scrutiny.	Make the Argument, Then Defend It Students write a 1-page argument for a specific organizational decision: a policy change, a resource allocation, a strategic direction, a personnel decision. They must state their claim, provide at least three reasons with evidence, and acknowledge at least one counterargument. Peer reviewers evaluate: Is the claim clear? Is the evidence relevant? Is the counterargument addressed honestly? Writers then revise with a brief note explaining what they changed and why. This mirrors the reasoning process behind virtually every professional recommendation.	ENGL 387/SPCH 387, SPCH 260, JOUR 348, ISCI 402
  Organizational Problem Diagnosis Students are given a description of an underperforming team, department, or initiative and must diagnose what is actually wrong before recommending solutions. Emphasis on separating symptoms from root causes.	What Is Really Going On? Provide a 1-page organizational scenario: a team that is consistently missing deliverables, a department with high turnover, an initiative that keeps stalling despite executive support. Students must produce a diagnosis: list three possible root causes, identify the evidence that supports or undermines each, and recommend the one most likely explanation with a rationale. They must explicitly identify what information they would need to be more certain. Debrief covers the diagnostic discipline of not jumping to solutions before understanding the problem.	MGMT 371, PSYC 350, SOCY 311, ISCI 402, JOUR 348

• Career and Self-Development

  Students completing a leadership certificate are making an intentional career investment. Activities should help them articulate what that investment produced: a leadership identity, a set of concrete capabilities, and a narrative they can use in interviews and professional settings.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Portfolio Entry Reflection At the end of a major assignment, students write a structured reflection connecting the work to a NACE competency, a career-relevant skill, and a specific interview talking point. Builds the habit of translating academic work into professional language.	What Did I Just Build? After any significant project or assignment, students complete: (1) What competency or skill did this assignment develop? (2) Name a job or role where this skill is valued. (3) Write one sentence you could say in an interview about this experience. Faculty collect these over the course of the certificate. Students accumulate a set of interview-ready talking points grounded in actual coursework — directly usable in a career advising appointment, on a resume, or in a LinkedIn profile.	All certificate courses
  Leadership Career Field Research Students research leadership and management roles in a career field of interest: what these roles require, how people get into them, and how the certificate specifically prepares them to compete for entry-level opportunities in that pathway.	Leadership in My Field Students select a career field and research two to three entry-level or early-career roles that involve leadership or project coordination. They produce a 1-page brief: What does leadership look like in this field at the entry level? What skills do these roles require? Which courses in this certificate most directly prepare me for them? What experience would I still need to build? This connects the certificate to real career pathways and gives students a concrete answer to the interview question: 'Why did you pursue this certificate?'	POLI 215, MGMT 371, JOUR 451, RETL 351, PEDU 302

   

A Note on Integration 

These activities are designed to be additive, not burdensome. A few principles for integration: 

• One well-designed reflection activity per unit is more valuable than multiple low-engagement checkboxes. Depth over volume.
• Name the competency explicitly. When students know they are developing Leadership or Professionalism, they can represent it. Tell them what they are building.
• Connect to the job market concretely. Employers in this field ask about this exact skill is more motivating than abstract competency language.
• The portfolio entry reflection (Career and Self-Development section) can be attached to almost any assignment across all competencies — it is the single highest-leverage addition with the lowest faculty burden.
• Faculty interested in connecting these activities to the Carolina Career Ready campus network or the Career Champions program are encouraged to reach out to the USC Career Center.