Office of the Provost

On This Page

Primary Alignments

Primary Alignment competencies have strong, direct alignment across multiple courses.

Expand All

• Communication

  Communication is the defining purpose of this certificate. Activities should not treat writing and speaking as generic skills to be practiced — they should treat them as strategic instruments requiring deliberate audience analysis, message design, and professional judgment. Every communication activity is an opportunity to make a purposeful choice.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Strategic Message Design Students are given a communication goal and a defined audience and must design a message strategy before drafting anything: who is the audience, what do they already believe, what do they need to hear, and what is the desired outcome. Strategy precedes execution.	Plan Before You Write Before any major written or oral assignment, students complete a 1-page message brief: audience profile (what do they know, what do they care about, what might make them resistant), core message (one sentence), supporting points (three maximum), and desired outcome (what should the audience do or believe after receiving this communication). Faculty collect the brief alongside the finished product and give feedback on whether the execution matched the strategy. This mirrors the planning process that professional communicators use and that most students skip entirely.	SPCH 230, SPCH 380, JOUR 201, JOUR 291, ENGL 363, ITEC 242
  Multi-Platform Communication Exercise Students take a single message or story and adapt it for three different platforms or formats: a written press release, a social media post, and an oral presentation. The exercise makes visible how platform shapes message, tone, length, and strategy.	One Story, Three Platforms Students are given a scenario: a nonprofit organization has just launched a new community initiative and needs to communicate it to three audiences simultaneously. Students produce a 300-word press release for media outlets, a 3-post social media campaign, and a 3-minute verbal pitch for a community meeting. Each version is evaluated on whether it is genuinely adapted to its platform and audience rather than just reformatted. Debrief asks: what changed across versions and why? What stayed constant and why? This develops the strategic flexibility that communications professionals use daily.	JOUR 201, JOUR 285, JOUR 291, SPCH 140, SPCH 145, ENGL 363
  Professional Writing Workshop Students draft, exchange, and revise professional written communications under structured peer review using employer-facing evaluation criteria. Emphasis on clarity, precision, and professional register rather than academic conventions.	Write to Be Read  Students draft a professional document relevant to their target career field: a pitch email, a client proposal, a media advisory, an advocacy letter, or an organizational briefing. Peer reviewers evaluate using a simple rubric: Is the purpose clear in the first sentence? Is every paragraph necessary? Does the close ask for something specific? Would a busy professional act on this? Writers revise with a brief note explaining what they changed and why. The shift from academic writing conventions to professional writing standards is one of the most impactful skill transitions students can make before entering the workforce.	ENGL 363, ITEC 242, JOUR 291, JOUR 201, SPCH 213, PHIL 213

   

• Critical Thinking

  Strategic communication is applied critical thinking. Students must analyze audiences, evaluate arguments, diagnose communication failures, and make principled judgments under complexity and constraint. Activities should make that reasoning visible and subject to evaluation rather than leaving it implicit.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Argument Deconstruction Students analyze a real persuasive communication artifact: a speech, an advertisement, a political statement, a public relations campaign, or an editorial. They identify the argument structure, evaluate the evidence, name the rhetorical strategies at work, and assess the ethical dimensions of the approach.	Take It Apart Students select or are assigned a real-world persuasive artifact and produce a 1-2 page rhetorical analysis: What is the central claim? What evidence is offered and how strong is it? What emotional, logical, and credibility appeals are made? Who is the intended audience and how is the message calibrated for them? Is anything being obscured or oversimplified? What would a skeptical audience say in response? This exercise builds the analytical discipline that underlies both effective communication and effective resistance to manipulation.	SPCH 260, SPCH 380, ENGL 387/SPCH 387, JOUR 303, PSYC 430
  Communication Failure Diagnosis Students analyze a documented communication failure: a PR crisis, a mishandled public statement, a campaign that backfired, or an organizational message that caused harm. They diagnose what went wrong strategically and recommend what should have been done differently.	What Went Wrong and Why? Present a real communication failure with enough documented context to analyze it: a corporate crisis response that escalated the problem, a public health campaign that generated backlash, a nonprofit statement that alienated donors, a political message that missed its audience entirely. Students write a 1-page diagnostic memo: what was the communication goal, what strategy was used, where did the strategy fail, and what should have been done instead? Debrief covers the gap between intent and impact as a recurring theme in professional communication.	JOUR 303, JOUR 304, SPCH 380, JOUR 201, PSYC 430, SPCH 260
  Audience Psychology Analysis Drawing on social psychology frameworks, students analyze how a specific audience is likely to receive a specific message: what cognitive biases are active, what prior beliefs are at play, and what communication approaches are most and least likely to be effective.	Inside the Audience Students select a communication challenge: convincing skeptical employees to adopt a new policy, persuading a community to support a development project, motivating volunteers to increase their commitment. They produce a 1-page audience analysis drawing on at least two social psychology concepts from the course (confirmation bias, social proof, reciprocity, framing effects, identity threat, and others). They then recommend a specific message strategy based on that analysis and explain the reasoning. This bridges psychology and communication in the way that professional communicators in PR, advocacy, and management actually work.	PSYC 430, SPCH 380, SPCH 260, JOUR 201, SAEL 200

• Professionalism

  The ethics depth in this certificate is unusual and worth using explicitly. Students are not just exposed to ethical concepts — they encounter them across multiple professional contexts: journalism, business, medicine, engineering, advocacy, and law. Activities should surface the real complexity of professional communication ethics, not reduce it to simple rules.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Ethical Communication Scenario Students are placed in a professional communication role and given a scenario where the most effective message is not the most honest or transparent one. They must decide what to communicate, how, and why — and defend that decision using an ethical framework.	What Do You Say? Present a scenario: 'You are a public relations professional. Your organization has made a mistake that caused harm to a small number of people. Leadership wants to release a statement that is technically accurate but strategically designed to minimize attention and avoid accountability. You are asked to draft it. What do you do?' Students write a 1-page response: what they would draft, what they would refuse to draft, and the ethical reasoning behind each decision. Debrief surfaces the tension between professional loyalty, client service, public interest, and personal integrity that communications professionals navigate regularly.	JOUR 201, JOUR 303, JOUR 304, PHIL 213/SPCH 213, SAEL 200
  Media Law and Ethics Application Students apply journalism law and ethics frameworks to real or hypothetical scenarios involving defamation, privacy, social media conduct, or digital content. They practice making defensible professional judgments within legal and ethical boundaries.	Is This Legal? Is This Right? Present a set of five scenarios involving digital and mass communications: a social media post that may constitute defamation, a news story that reveals private information about a public figure, a sponsored post that is not clearly labeled, an AI-generated image used in a news context, a data breach involving audience information. For each scenario, students answer: Is this legal? Is this ethical? What should a responsible professional do? The distinction between legal and ethical is the productive friction the exercise is designed to create. Students must justify each judgment with reference to course frameworks.	JOUR 303, JOUR 304, PHIL 324, SAEL 200, JOUR 285

Supporting Alignments

Supporting Alignment competencies have meaningful, specific alignment. Faculty may find activities in supporting competency sections useful for reinforcing career readiness in targeted ways without overloading the course.

Expand All

• Teamwork

  Teamwork in a communications certificate has a specific shape: students are learning to coordinate communication across diverse groups, navigate cultural and linguistic difference, and manage stakeholder relationships in collaborative professional contexts. Activities should develop both interpersonal awareness and practical coordination skills.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Cross-Cultural Communication Simulation Students navigate a professional communication scenario that involves cultural difference: a miscommunication between colleagues from different cultural backgrounds, a message that lands differently across cultural contexts, or a campaign that works in one cultural context but fails in another.	Lost in Translation Students are given a brief case: a professional communication that was well-intentioned but caused offense, confusion, or disengagement due to cultural difference. They analyze what happened from both cultural perspectives, identify the specific communication norms that created the gap, and revise the communication for a cross-cultural context. Pairs from different background perspectives debrief together: what did each person notice that the other did not? This develops the perspective-taking and cultural humility that intercultural communication courses are designed to build but that can remain abstract without an applied scenario.	ANTH/LING 273, FORL 360, POLI/LING 240, PSYC 430
  Stakeholder Communication Plan Students develop a communication plan for reaching multiple stakeholders with different interests, relationships, and information needs. They map the stakeholders, differentiate the messages, and sequence the communication. Builds the coordination and audience management skills that collaborative professional environments require.	Who Needs to Hear What and When? Students are given an organizational scenario: a nonprofit is launching a new program that affects donors, volunteers, clients, media, and community partners differently. Students produce a 1-page stakeholder communication plan: who are the key audiences, what does each need to know, in what order should they be communicated with, and what is the core message for each group. Teams compare plans and debrief: where did your sequencing differ? What assumptions did you make about each audience? This mirrors the planning process behind any significant organizational communication and develops the audience awareness that distinguishes strategic communicators.	JOUR 201, JOUR 333, SPCH 331, PSYC 430, RETL 487

• Leadership

  Strategic communication is one of the primary instruments of leadership. Activities in this section should help students recognize that communication is not just a technical skill — it is how leaders build trust, shape culture, mobilize action, and exercise influence. The goal is for students to see themselves as communicators who lead, not just communicators who report.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Advocacy Campaign Design Students design a communication campaign for a cause, organization, or issue they care about. They develop the message strategy, identify the target audiences, select the communication channels, and draft the core materials. Develops the leadership perspective of communicating on behalf of something larger than oneself.	Make the Case for Something That Matters Students select a cause, community issue, or organizational challenge and design a 3-part advocacy campaign: a core message statement (one paragraph), a stakeholder analysis (who needs to be persuaded and what do they care about), and a draft of one key communication artifact (a speech opening, a letter to decision-makers, a social media campaign). The campaign is evaluated on strategic coherence: does the message match the audience, does the artifact execute the strategy, and does the whole thing add up to a persuasive case? Debrief asks: what does it feel like to communicate on behalf of something you believe in? How does that change what you are willing to say and how you say it?	SAEL 200, SPCH 380, JOUR 333, SPCH 260, PHIL 213/SPCH 213
  Organizational Narrative Exercise Students develop or revise an organizational narrative: the story an organization tells about who it is, why it exists, and why it matters. This develops the strategic framing skills that leaders use to build culture, attract talent, engage stakeholders, and sustain purpose.	Tell the Organization's Story Students select a real organization (one they belong to, work for, or admire) and produce two documents: (1) A 1-paragraph organizational narrative that answers: who are we, what do we believe, and why does what we do matter? (2) A 1-paragraph reflection on how the narrative they wrote differs from how the organization currently describes itself, and what the gap reveals. Debrief covers the role of narrative in organizational leadership: how leaders use story to shape culture, communicate values, and motivate action. Connects directly to RETL 487 content and SAEL 200 frameworks.	RETL 487, SAEL 200, JOUR 201, JOUR 333, SPCH 380

   

• Career and Self-Development

  Students completing this certificate are making a deliberate investment in one of the most valued professional skill sets across every industry. Activities should help them see what they have built, name it with specificity, and connect it to where they are headed. The certificate earns its career value when students can articulate it precisely.

  Activity type	Example assignment	Suggested courses
  Portfolio Entry Reflection At the end of a major assignment, students write a structured reflection connecting the work to a NACE competency, a career-relevant skill, and a specific interview talking point. Builds the habit of translating academic work into professional language.	What Did I Just Build? After any significant project or assignment, students complete: (1) What competency or skill did this assignment develop? (2) Name a job or role where this skill is valued. (3) Write one sentence you could say in an interview about this experience. Faculty collect these over the course of the certificate. Students accumulate a set of interview-ready talking points grounded in actual coursework — directly usable in a career advising appointment, on a resume, or in a LinkedIn profile.	All certificate courses
  Communication Portfolio Curation Students select their strongest written and oral communication work from the certificate and prepare it as a professional portfolio artifact — cleaned up, contextualized, and framed for a specific employer audience. Builds the career self-presentation skill that directly bridges the certificate to the job search.	Build the Sample Students select one written artifact from the certificate that best represents their communication skills for their target career field. They revise it for a professional audience (removing academic framing, adding context a hiring manager would need), write a 2-sentence caption explaining what it demonstrates professionally, and identify three specific roles or employers where they would include it in an application. Peer review asks: does this sample make you want to hire this person? What does it prove and what does it leave open? This exercise produces a tangible career asset from coursework that might otherwise stay in a folder.	ENGL 363, JOUR 201, JOUR 291, SPCH 230, SPCH 380, all certificate courses

   

A Note on Integration 

These activities are designed to be additive, not burdensome. A few principles for integration:

• One well-designed reflection activity per unit is more valuable than multiple low-engagement checkboxes. Depth over volume.
• Name the competency explicitly. When students know they are developing Communication strategy or Critical Thinking through rhetoric, they can represent it. Tell them what they are building.
• Connect to the job market concretely. Employers in this field ask about this exact skill is more motivating than abstract competency language.
• The portfolio entry reflection (Career and Self-Development section) and the communication portfolio curation activity are the two highest-leverage additions — one builds self-awareness, the other produces a tangible career asset.
• Faculty interested in connecting these activities to the Carolina Career Ready campus network or the Career Champions program are encouraged to reach out to the USC Career Center.